The question of whether individuals can perceive the world objectively, free from their own perspectives, has sparked considerable debate in both philosophy and neuroscience.
Consider the scenario where a person gazes upon an object that, due to their perspective, appears different from its actual nature. For instance, a circular coin rotated toward them may seem to take on an oval shape.
Traditionally, it was believed that the brain, in processing the image captured by the retina, eliminates the individual's perspective, representing the object in its true form—in this case, as a circle.
However, researchers from the Perception and Mind Lab at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore challenged this notion. Conducting a series of experiments, they explored how people identify objects under various conditions. Their findings suggest that the brain's representation of an object encompasses the observer's perception, not just its objective reality. Consequently, according to their conclusion, a person cannot perceive an object entirely divorced from their viewpoint.
This discovery challenges established assumptions in philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience and is documented in the journal PNAS.
The complexity of a person's perception extends beyond the mere reception of light waves by the eyes. It involves intricate transformations by the brain, influenced by past experiences and knowledge of the world.
The philosophical debate centers on whether individuals ever truly escape their subjective viewpoint when distorted perspectives alter an object's appearance. Senior author Chaz Firestone and his team delve into whether the brain shapes its representation of an object based on how an individual sees it, even if the observer acknowledges the true form of the object.
To experimentally test this concept, the researchers conducted nine experiments, involving computer-generated and real-world objects. The results consistently indicated that people cannot entirely separate an object's true identity from their subjective perception.
The experiments, involving various coin shapes, rotations, and sizes, demonstrated that participants' response times significantly slowed when presented with tilted, circular coins simultaneously with oval coins. This suggests that the brain represented the tilted coin as oval, rather than acknowledging its actual circular form. These findings highlight the persistence of subjective influence on perception.
Lead author Jorge Morales emphasized that, even when attempting to perceive the world objectively, individuals cannot fully discard their perspective. The study underscores the empirical testing of philosophical ideas and represents the initial step in a series of experiments aimed at enhancing our understanding of human perception.
Commentaires